
The Strata Building Bond and Inspections Scheme, commonly referred to as the SBBIS, was introduced by the NSW Government as part of a broader effort to improve confidence and accountability in the construction industry. For Owners Corporations of newly completed residential apartment buildings, this scheme provides an important layer of financial protection, but only if the process is properly understood and actively engaged with.
Under the SBBIS, developers of certain strata residential apartment buildings are required to lodge a building bond with the Secretary of the NSW Government before an occupation certificate is issued. The bond is currently calculated at two per cent of the total contract price for all contracts for the building work, noting that a planned increase to three per cent has been deferred until 1 July 2026. The bond applies not only to residential components but also to common property, car parks, and mixed-use areas such as retail or commercial spaces within the same building.
The purpose of the building bond is to ensure that funds are available to rectify defects in the building if the developer fails to do so. If no defects are identified through the inspection process, or if all identified defects are properly rectified, the bond is returned to the developer. Importantly, the bond is held by the NSW Government, not by the Owners Corporation, and it can only be accessed through the formal SBBIS process.
A central feature of the SBBIS is the requirement for independent inspections of the building. An independent and appropriately qualified building inspector is appointed to carry out an interim inspection between 15 and 18 months after the building is completed, followed by a final inspection between 21 and 24 months after completion. These inspections focus on defects affecting common property. The inspector produces reports identifying any defects and, at the final inspection, assessing whether those defects have been adequately rectified.
While the inspection process is regulated, the role of the Owners Corporation is critical. The effectiveness of the scheme depends heavily on whether defects are properly identified, documented, and addressed during the inspection period. If defects are missed, poorly described, or not challenged when necessary, the opportunity to rely on the building bond may be lost. For this reason, Owners Corporations should take an active role in the process, carefully review inspection reports, raise concerns about additional defects, and ensure that known issues are brought to the inspector’s attention.
If defects identified through the SBBIS process are not rectified by the developer, the bond may be used by the Secretary to fund rectification works. However, the bond is limited in value and may not be sufficient to address all defects. This makes early identification and strategic use of the SBBIS process particularly important. Owners Corporations that are passive or disengaged risk finding themselves responsible for rectification costs once the bond is released.
Given the technical and legal complexity of building defect issues, many Owners Corporations benefit from obtaining independent building and legal advice during the SBBIS process. Expert input can assist in identifying defects that may not be obvious, ensuring that inspection reports accurately reflect the condition of the building, and protecting the Owners Corporation’s position if disputes arise. Early advice is especially important, as missed deadlines or procedural missteps can significantly limit the ability to recover funds under the bond.
Ultimately, the Strata Building Bond and Inspections Scheme is a valuable consumer protection mechanism, but it is not automatic. Owners Corporations that understand the process, monitor key timeframes, and actively participate in inspections are far better placed to protect their building and their financial interests. Being informed and proactive from the outset can make the difference between recovering funds to address defects and being left to bear those costs long after the developer has exited the project.
If you’re concerned or have any questions about your defect claim or building bond matter, reach out to us for a free professional consultation.
.
.
A Practical Guide to Design Practitioner Registration in NSW
The NSW Design and Building Practitioners (DBP) scheme sets out who must be registered when preparing designs for certain types of buildings and what…
Stay Fully Covered: How HBCF Works and What Homeowners Must Do to Comply
The Home Building Compensation Fund (HBCF) protects NSW homeowners if their builder cannot finish the work or fix defects because they have become…
Be on time: Expert Evidence and the Danger of Personal Costs Orders
Delay in serving and filing evidence can be a dangerous thing sometimes. The case of The Owners - Strata Plan No. 94784 v Mirvac Projects Pty Ltd (No…
Understanding What Is a “Major Defect” Under the Home Building Act
When someone makes a building defect claim after the two-year warranty period for non-major (minor) defects has already passed, one of the first and…
Checklist: Could This Be a Major Defect?
A simple guide for homeowners and strata committees. Use this checklist to help work out whether a building problem may qualify as a major defect.
Upholding your rights in courts and tribunals
Our lawyers will not hesitate to uphold your rights with fear or favour. We’ve done this continually for 60 years – the length of time that our firm…
Transfer of Building & Strata Claims between NCAT and Courts
Clients will need to be extremely careful as to where a building and construction claim is commenced. NCAT (or the Tribunal) has primary jurisdiction…
Pleading Building and Design Practitioners Act Matters
The Building and Design Practitioners Act 2020 was a revolution in the way defects related claims in relation to home building (and in fact, in…
Appeals in Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (SOPA)
Claims under the Building and Construction Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SOPA), the related responses (payment schedules) as well as disputes…
Owner-Builders: The Pitfalls
As we have intimated on these pages previously, the NSW Home building Act 1989 (HBA) and the Building and Design Practitioners Act 2020 (DBPA) have…
Suing designers, architects, certifiers, insurers, and speculative damages
We have previously discussed the importance of the NSW Home building Act 1989 (HBA) and the Building and Design Practitioners Act 2020 (DBPA) in…
Care when bringing contractual claims
Utmost care should be taken when you (as a builder say, or an engineer, or an architect) want to bring contractual claims for damages or unpaid fees,…
The Value of an Experienced Expert in NSW Building Claims
When building defects or construction disputes arise in New South Wales, one of the most important decisions an owner, strata committee, builder, or…
Building Defect Discovered in Your New Property? Key Things to Consider
Finding a building defect can be stressful, particularly because the consequences can range from minor inconvenience to major financial loss, safety…
Lot Property vs Common Property in NSW Strata (and Why It Matters)
If you live in a strata scheme in New South Wales, one of the most important things to understand is what you own as a lot owner, and what belongs to…
Plead it properly or ‘go away’: Building and Design Practitioners Act Cases can be a nightmare for many!
Our lawyers are experts and are at the cutting edge of properly prosecuting and defending the Design and Building Practitioners Act (DBPA) claims.…
Understanding “completion date” for strata and non-strata buildings and why they matter
When dealing with building defects, one of the most important steps is identifying the date of completion of the work. This date is critical because…
















